The Intelligence Brief is Rhetoric Audit’s cross-platform narrative intelligence feature. Where a standard analysis examines a single article, an Intelligence Brief aggregates signals from five platforms simultaneously — X, Reddit, YouTube, News, and the open Web — and synthesizes them into a single report that answers a harder question: not just how one article is framed, but how a narrative is spreading, who is amplifying it, and how much of that amplification is organic.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://www.rhetoricaudit.com/docs/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Intelligence Briefs are currently in beta. Each brief costs 2 credits, and PDF export is included at no additional cost. To generate your first brief, go to Dashboard → Intelligence Brief.
What the brief covers
An Intelligence Brief gives you five categories of intelligence about a topic or narrative.Authenticity Score
A score from 0 to 100 measuring how much of the engagement around a narrative appears organic versus coordinated. Lower scores indicate higher proportions of inauthentic amplification — bot networks, coordinated account clusters, or synchronized posting patterns.
Emotion Profile
The dominant emotional signals present across all collected content, broken into four dimensions: Fear, Outrage, Urgency, and Hope. Each is derived from aggregated Plutchik analysis across the full cross-platform corpus, not from a single source.
Contagion Risk
A four-level rating — LOW / MOD / HIGH / ELEVATED — measuring how likely the narrative is to spread rapidly across platforms. The rating factors in amplification velocity, emotional charge, and early cross-platform presence.
Coordinated Amplification Detection
The brief identifies whether clusters of accounts are amplifying the same narrative in temporal or semantic coordination. This goes beyond bot detection — coordinated inauthentic behavior can involve real accounts acting in concert.
Narrative pattern analysis
Beyond the scored dimensions, the brief surfaces the dominant narrative patterns present across all five platforms. This identifies how different communities are framing the same event or topic — whether the mainstream news framing and the social media framing agree, diverge, or are in active opposition. When public sentiment and verifiable evidence disagree, the brief flags the dissonance explicitly.Platforms analyzed
The brief pulls from five independent data streams, processed in parallel:| Platform | Signal type |
|---|---|
| X (Twitter) | Real-time amplification patterns, engagement velocity, account cluster behavior |
| Community framing, upvote/comment dynamics, cross-subreddit spread | |
| YouTube | Video narrative framing, comment sentiment, view-count trajectory |
| News | Cross-outlet coverage volume, framing consistency, editorial positioning |
| Open Web | Broader corroboration and syndication across non-news domains |
How to generate a brief
Enter your topic or URL
Type a topic, entity name, or event description — or paste a URL to anchor the brief around a specific article or story. The system uses this as the seed for cross-platform signal collection.
Review and confirm
You will see a preview of the platforms that will be queried and a confirmation that 2 credits will be deducted. Confirm to start the brief generation.
Use cases
Tracking how a narrative spreads
Tracking how a narrative spreads
Journalists and researchers use Intelligence Briefs to map how a story moves from first publication through social amplification to mainstream coverage — and to identify where the framing shifts between platforms. The cross-platform narrative pattern analysis is particularly useful here.
Detecting coordinated inauthentic behavior
Detecting coordinated inauthentic behavior
Communications teams, policy analysts, and security researchers use the coordinated amplification detection and Authenticity Score to distinguish organic public reaction from manufactured consensus. An Authenticity Score below 50 on a high-reach narrative warrants direct investigation of the amplification network.
Assessing narrative risk before publication
Assessing narrative risk before publication
Editors and communications officers generate briefs on topics they are about to cover or publish on, to understand the emotional temperature and contagion risk of the information environment they are entering. A HIGH or ELEVATED Contagion Risk rating is a signal to build in extra verification time and consider how the publication’s framing might interact with the existing narrative.
Monitoring ongoing stories over time
Monitoring ongoing stories over time
Because each brief is saved to your dashboard history, you can generate briefs on the same topic at different points in time to track how the Authenticity Score, Emotion Profile, and Contagion Risk evolve as a story develops.
